Strange Biology

1.5M ratings
277k ratings

See, that’s what the app is perfect for.

Sounds perfect Wahhhh, I don’t wanna
blackbackedjackal

Anonymous asked:

what's the wackest shit youve seen on a specimen? like the real "how did you survive that" shit. the real "hey okay that bone is in a place a different bone should be and the first bone is gone" shit. the real "theoretically this animal needed a functioning spine but it seemed to get along fine with the piece of shit it was given." the real "wow you were born with far too many/far too few bones huh" shit. pls i wanna know!!

blackbackedjackal answered:

image
image
image
image

Any one of these coyotes has left me baffled on how they survived after such severe injuries. Especially the ones with the messed up jaws.

image

Like?? how???

me trying to think of what happened with that last one I imagine the other part of the jaw was inside somewhere
theunitofcaring
theunitofcaring

Job ad! Come be my coworker!

I work at Vox’s Future Perfect, a grant-funded effective-altruism-inspired vertical focused on high impact writing on some of the world’s most important problems.

Some of the stories I’m proudest of over the last few years has covered the case for catastrophic AI risk, the rise of plant-based meat, progress towards malaria vaccines, and the case for better biosafety and pandemic preparedness (unfortunately, those pieces all look really good in retrospect). 

Now, we’re expanding Future Perfect! We’ll be hiring three full-time fellows for a one-year fellowship. Starting salary depends on your experience but Vox’s minimum salary for any role is $56,000. You’ll write for Future Perfect on any of the above topics or other topics of global importance that you want to become an expert in and bring to our audience. You don’t need to have a journalism background; I think the most important qualification is a commitment to understanding and improving the world, with the EA lens that makes Future Perfect different from everything else in journalism.

If you’re potentially interested and want to know more about what working at Vox/at Future Perfect is like, feel free to reach out to me here or at kelsey.piper@vox.com. And please share this post: I think hiring the right people will make a huge difference to the potential value of the Future Perfect fellows program.

The Open Notebook got a grant and is offering a free “master class” in science journalism. If you’re interested in the field, this could be a good place to experiment. Frankly I’m sure the knowledge you learn from this is of the same quality as anything you can get from paid, formal education, you’d just lack the networking and probably some of the opportunities. 

The MIT Science Writing Master’s program is also free, as in funded, actually you get a stipend to go, but it’s a master’s program at MIT, not an online course you can just finish or not finish. It’s full time, in person, very serious, and you have to actually get in. Getting accepted takes months of prep.

Full disclosure, I discourage you from joining my field of science journalism as a career or side hustle, unless you’re dead-set or you don’t need money for some reason, because the job market is awful.

FAQ

science journalism scicomm
how2skinatiger

kyuubinu asked:

So, wait. If they were Sold by the fur farm then that generates profit for said farm. That's less a rescue proper and more a fuzzy feel good word on the shady fox acquisition :/

is-the-owl-vid-cute answered:

Oh it absolutely is just helping out the fur farm lol.

how2skinatiger

It’s hilarious how these fox ‘rescues’ will bad mouth fur farmers and come up with sob stories about how evil they are then turn around and repeatedly hand over money to keep them in business. 

strangebiology

This is very much a thing. Read Washington Post’s article Dog rescuers, flush with donations, buy animals from the breeders they scorn

Of course not all rescues do this! Probably most of them are wonderful! But the rescue community has a huge problem with rescues just being dog flippers with charity status. Some highlights from the very well-investigated article include: 

  • Rescue generates about one-third, maybe even 40 percent of our income,” says Bob Hughes, Southwest’s [Dog Auction where breeders sell dogs] owner. 

  • Leading nonprofit animal-welfare groups, including the ASPCA, HSUS and the American Kennel Club purebred advocacy group, say rescuers are misguided in buying dogs at auction because the money they pay only encourages more breeding on a commercial scale.

  • [R]escuers bid against each other for designer crossbred puppies such as morkies and puggles, and breeders consider the rescuers to be a reliable market for those pups because adopters clamor for them, making them a “cash cow” in the rescue community.

  • The article also describes someone paying $10,000 for one dog because they had so much from donations.

  • One rescuer made a sob-story video claiming that the dogs she rescued lived in basically rabbit hutches and had never felt grass before. The breeder she bought them from offers free public viewings of their baseball field-sized grassy, sunny enclosures. 

I’m not anti-rescue by any means! Save-A-Fox rescue, for instance, never buys foxes, only takes in ones that the breeder didn’t want at all anyway. She bought one animal and actually clearly says it’s not a true rescue. The rest are all genuinely saved!

There are lots of ways to get pets and they all come with controversy. I recommend trying to get to know the rescue or shelter you’re getting from, or even getting one from your community when a neighbor or relative moves or dies. Be wary of paying a lot of money for an animal that was supposedly unwanted.

Source: is-the-owl-vid-cute
dogs rescue animal rescue
cummy--eyelids
jaketeachesdeath

image
image

This Weasel has a really bad case of Skrjabingylus nasicola.


These nasal worms are pretty vile. Thier main hosts seem to be Molluscs, the larvae are in thier third stage of development by the time they reach the Weasel. Once ingested by the Weasel they moult twice more and pass through the gut to the nasal cavity.


The worst part is they travel there through the spinal cord. Then they just chill in the nasal cavity for the rest of thier days.


12/05/21

Source: jaketeachesdeath
vulture culture dead animals ugh I've seen stuff like this sad to know what it is now
wildlifemajor
aupair

image
image
image
image
image

brb sending this to my entire history of science department

junewild

image
thatguythatlikesmgsstayswinning

I literally cannot comprehend this

image
strangebiology

My take is they’re both valid. Steak-umm is more nuanced and it’s important to know what they’re saying but I don’t think it’s necessary to always pick apart every soundbite because you can’t put all those nuanced tweets on a tee-shirt. (I guess I’m picking apart these tweets but whatever)

Generally science is the study of reality, so it is protean and prone to human knowledge, analysis, emotion, and in that sense Steak-umm is right. However in this context NDT most likely meant science to be the actual reality, as in, things that actually happened and the actual makeup of our universe. 

Context is important. I’m pretty sure this quote was originally around in some form during internet creationism vs. evolution debates. I could swear I heard Richard Dawkins, who is most famous for evolution debates, say this.

Biblical creationism arguments hinge strictly on belief. “It’s true because I was raised to believe it" or “it’s true because it makes me feel good to believe it” or “it’s true because believing it is ethically correct,” “it’s true because I will be eternally punished if I don’t believe it.” If no one believed in creationism, there would be no creationism. If people start believing something else about creationism, like it took 18 billion years and involved a giant talking cockroach, then boom, there are no rules, that’s what creationism is now.

So a good response to “belief makes things true” is “scientific things are true regardless of belief.” 

I find the soundbite to be a good, simple response to creationist and other anti-science ideology. You will still be related to monkeys even if you find believing that immoral. Vaccines still work even if you find conspiracy theories against them to be entertaining. Climate change will still affect you even if believing it makes you sad. You are not the one person in the world who is so special that whatever you feel like believing or were taught becomes true because of your beliefs. 

That, I think, is a better takeaway than “every scientist is right about everything.” 

Source: gunpowdermilfshake
science scicomm
paleo-witch
strangebiology

Lots more bones yesterday!

paleo-witch

Ya'know, I don't know why I even try anymore.

I keep warning you about the werewolf dens.

And you keep going to the fucking werewolf dens anyway.

... I'm just gonna.let what comes next be a surprise...

strangebiology

But I didn’t even include the part where I went in the cave!

image

And I found bones inside too!

image

Here’s the TikTok!

paleo-witch

AND YOU WENT INSIDE WHAT THE FUCK!??!

image
Source: strangebiology
drop a line if you're here from twitter

Journalism Funding Ethics

You know I’ve had writing jobs at three different news outlets with different types of funding (excluding smaller jobs.) While that isn’t a lot of data, they had greatly different approaches to ethics and it makes you wonder how funding impacts ethics. 

Funded by grants and profitable parts of the company like books and movies, owned by a known conservative, operated by liberals: “Always fact check and tell the truth as much as possible. Occasionally write an article that goes with a book or documentary to promote it.” 

Funded by grants and government: “Always fact check and tell the truth as much as possible. We’re not afraid when prez threatens to cut our funding. Don’t even tweet your personal political opinions, we only say facts because they are facts whether they confirm or reject our biases.” 

Funded by clicks: “DO ALMOST ANYTHING FOR CLICKS! What is truth, anyway? Technically our policy is to fact check but considering the insane amount of writing we expect you to do, your time budget for fact checking each article is like -12 minutes. Find a ‘controversial’ twitter thread with four comments and act like it’s a point of national debate. If study says ‘most,’ just write ‘all.’ Write the headline as though correlation is causation, or so a political figure looks more evil or stupid than they are. Don’t lie, but sometimes we’ll make you get as close to lies as possible. Also we’ll fire you if clue people in to the fact that we are literal criminals”


Anyway this is just what I gleaned, I would love to do a study with more data and accuracy ratings and such one day, or just to hear more experiences. Obviously I’m not a perfect judge and I definitely haven’t found a perfect funding model for journalism. 

Journalism News Scicomm Journalism ethics IDK if anyone cares but if you do I can tell you whatever you want about my funding and finances I believe in never concealing info about funding but also in not posting too much that people don't care about lol

Anonymous asked:

Hi! I love animal anatomy and find skeletons fascinating but have been afraid of collecting bones I find and messing with the bodies because of fear of diseases and other nasty things. How dangerous is it and how can one safely collect and observe dead animals and their bones?

I grew up outdoors but was always told to stay away from dead animals and that they were dangerous and gross. Seeing how you just pick up bones like they are nothing makes me think they must not be as bad as I was previously told. I also live in an area that is wet and mild most of the year, so decomp can be messy and smelly for a lot of things.

Yeah! There is reason for some fear of dead animals, but I think it’s not as dangerous as most people think. Consider the carved horn and tortoiseshell you see at gift shops, gator heads, coyote teeth, raccoon hats, etc. No one’s concerned. The FDA regulates food safety, but consider the amount of dead animal people eat and how often they get sick from it, yet we consider that par for the course.

This is also a tough question because most people don’t want to hear that something *isn’t that dangerous,* they just want warnings. Or, they only feel that talking about danger is responsible. But I believe in risk assessment, instead of just talking about what could go wrong, so here’s my assessment.

Most diseases die pretty quickly once the host dies, and most aren’t transferable to humans (although as we know from Covid, it is very bad when they make the jump! But keep in mind that happened where there were a ton of people and live animals pooping on each other in close proximity.)

One issue when an animal dies is the fleas and ticks leave the body and run to the end of the hairs, desperate for a new host. Depending on where you live, your risk assessment regarding insect-spread diseases like lyme will be different. I don’t usually pick up fresh deads for that reason and because they are stinky and heavy and they also require some processing that I have less experience with. In that case you could hide the body and come back for it later, or I have a few times skinned and disemboweled animals (Gross Youtube Tutorial). I’m pretty sure I learned from this child but I can only find how he tans hides.

For fresher things, you can use gloves and freeze them if you have a freezer for….not food….that will kill the bugs. Fresh deads also have the benefit of generally being less weathered/chewed on/broken up. But I definitely don’t bring them inside unless I have to and they’re frozen or too fresh to start stinking.

I’ve heard to stay away from armadillos because they carry leprosy. I haven’t actually researched it because I’ve never seen one.

If you’re transporting animal remains, try to be cautious of diseases you could take from one area to another. There are many laws about what states you can bring deer parts into and out of (which I doubt can be enforced because there are so many carved antlers in gift shops) because it’s important not to spread chronic wasting disease. CWD is a prion disease, and unfortunately prions don’t die when the host dies, because they can’t die at all, because they are not alive. There has been a lot of debate regarding whether CWD spread to humans, but when doing your risk assessment, consider the huge portion of the population that regularly eats deer and has never reported a case of CWD transmission. Low risk for humans, but definitely pay attention to those laws because it’s a big problem for deer.

I live in a very dry area, and dry bones are not really dangerous to humans IMO. Everything you do, from crossing the street to eating a carrot comes with some risk, and handling dry bones I’d put on par with with picking up rocks and sticks. You may even have some jewelry made of dry bones. Even if there is some dry, mummified flesh on them, the animal has probably been dead for months or years. In that case I walk around back to the yeard instead of taking it in the house but TBH I do touch it with my bare hands when I try to remove the flesh, and then wash my hands.

If you want to collect and live in a wet area, I might just say, wear gloves and double bag, then get them into a bucket for maceration ASAP. Or whatever technique you like, maybe burial would work ok in a wet environment, I actually don’t have much experience collecting and processing in wet environs.

Followers, did I miss anything specifically related to human health? I know you want to talk about laws and ethics and practical tactics but I can’t be here all night lol so let’s keep it to human health when collecting bones, and I enjoy seeing sources!

bone hunting vulture culture bones dead animals ask anon
From the National Museum of Wildlife Art:
“ June is National LGBTQ+ Pride Month. From antiquity to the present, LGBTQ+ artists have made invaluable contributions to the art world. Many LGBTQ+ artists have taken up animals and nature as subject...

From the National Museum of Wildlife Art: 

June is National LGBTQ+ Pride Month. From antiquity to the present, LGBTQ+ artists have made invaluable contributions to the art world. Many LGBTQ+ artists have taken up animals and nature as subject matter. In fact, the green stripe on the original Pride flag stood for nature. We are sharing information about some of the LGBTQ+ advocates and artists in our collection to celebrate not only the work of LGBTQ+ artists everywhere, but also the relationship between the LGBTQ+ community and the natural world.

Rosa Bonheur

Regarded as one of the greatest women artists of all time and commercially successful as a painter in a male-dominated field in her lifetime, Rosa Bonheur regularly broke social conventions of the day. She received special permission to wear pants for practical purposes, as most of her art focused on animals and long skirts were impractical for trudging through grassy and muddy fields with her painting supplies. However, even when not painting, she would often wear shirts, trousers, and ties instead of dresses. According to historian Mary Blume, Bonheur lived with her partner Nathalie Micas for 40 years (whom she described as her wife and next to whom she was buried after her own death) and with American artist Anna Elizabeth Klumpke, who inherited Bonheur’s estate after she died.

Bonheur’s “King of the Forest” is currently on display at the museum.
.
Rosa Bonheur (French, 1822 – 1899), “King of the Forest,” 1897. Pastel on Linen. 60 x 44 inches. Purchased with funds generously donated by the Robert S. and Grayce B. Kerr Foundation. National Museum of Wildlife Art.

Pride Month Deer Wildlife Art LGBT Rosa Bonheur